Study Break Memes and Funny Images
Future That Trump and a RINO Congress Are Creating
Quotes, Messages, and Social Media Posts of the Day
Other Links That May Interest You
Canada Trivia Quiz
Anatomy and Medical Terminology Trivia Quiz
Federal Reserve (Fed) Trivia Quiz
https://x.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/2038799310478020665
What a misleading headline from The Daily Mail.
The ATF ran a tool mark analysis on a bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie’s autopsy.
The result was “inconclusive” — not “no match.”
The jacket was too fragmented to compare, which also partially explains the lack of an exit wound.
The bullet shattered on impact.
“Inconclusive” means insufficient evidence to draw any conclusion.
It doesn’t mean the bullet “did NOT match” the rifle like the headline says.
The defense wants to use “inconclusive” as exculpatory evidence — but the prosecution wants to run chemical or molecular analysis comparing the jacket alloy to ammunition recovered with the gun.
Unlike tool mark analysis, it doesn’t require an intact bullet.
The defense is trying to block that testing from happening.
That’s the nuance of the real story.
Really thought I could expect better from JP and Joe.
I’ve deleted the JP tweet. I don’t believe for one second the official story on Charlie Kirk’s assassination, but I can see the headline on the bullet is indeed misleading. Sorry, I don’t always have time to be fucking perfect on everything I post.
You do have a point. I can do better a lot of the time also. Thank you